Imphal, September 06, 2009: The proscribed Revolutionary People's Front (RPF) � a political body of the PLA � has told the 'Indian Army' to leave Manipur while stating that the outfit wants them to return alive to their near and love ones at their respective places.
Stating that the nature of war in Manipur is political one, a statement issued by the RPF's department of publicity chief, GM Changjou asserted that the war waged in Manipur is a liberation war of the deprived and suppressed people.
It asserted that the RPF,its armed wing, the PLA, and the people neither wanted nor claimed even a pin-head size of 'Indian land'.
The RPF statement pointed out that it is natural that there would be a winner as well as a loser in a war.
It reminded that the 'security forces' have more concerns for their families.
They counted their fingers when they would be granted a leave in a year.
This is the weakness of the security forces.
The statement claimed that cadres of the outfit are imbued with a sense of patriotism.It is the characteristic of a war that both the opponents are pitching to defeat each others.
But the intricacy of a war happens when it comes to the question of valuing and respecting the International laws.
GM Changjou claimed that the RPF has so far shown and maintained respect to the International laws.
The enemy has known this stance of the outfit and they tried to take advantage of it.
It pointed out that there have been several instances wherein the 'Indian soldiers' resorted to committing atrocities to civilians and robbing the chastity and modesty of womenfolk.
Stating that the RPF/PLA did not want the security forces' dirty linen to be washed and rotted in the virgin land of mother Manipur, the statement urged them to leave Manipur safely for their respective places, where their kin are eagerly waiting for their safe return.
It tells the 'Indian army' to leave the state when there is still time.
Further, the RPF statement claimed that some casualties might have been suffered by the 34AR personnel in an encounter with the 253 A Coy of the PLA that took place in Ukhrul district on September 5 around 3.30pm.It asserted that the outfit did not suffer any casualty.
Stating that the nature of war in Manipur is political one, a statement issued by the RPF's department of publicity chief, GM Changjou asserted that the war waged in Manipur is a liberation war of the deprived and suppressed people.
It asserted that the RPF,its armed wing, the PLA, and the people neither wanted nor claimed even a pin-head size of 'Indian land'.
The RPF statement pointed out that it is natural that there would be a winner as well as a loser in a war.
It reminded that the 'security forces' have more concerns for their families.
They counted their fingers when they would be granted a leave in a year.
This is the weakness of the security forces.
The statement claimed that cadres of the outfit are imbued with a sense of patriotism.It is the characteristic of a war that both the opponents are pitching to defeat each others.
But the intricacy of a war happens when it comes to the question of valuing and respecting the International laws.
GM Changjou claimed that the RPF has so far shown and maintained respect to the International laws.
The enemy has known this stance of the outfit and they tried to take advantage of it.
It pointed out that there have been several instances wherein the 'Indian soldiers' resorted to committing atrocities to civilians and robbing the chastity and modesty of womenfolk.
Stating that the RPF/PLA did not want the security forces' dirty linen to be washed and rotted in the virgin land of mother Manipur, the statement urged them to leave Manipur safely for their respective places, where their kin are eagerly waiting for their safe return.
It tells the 'Indian army' to leave the state when there is still time.
Further, the RPF statement claimed that some casualties might have been suffered by the 34AR personnel in an encounter with the 253 A Coy of the PLA that took place in Ukhrul district on September 5 around 3.30pm.It asserted that the outfit did not suffer any casualty.
No comments:
Post a Comment